Sci Fi Channel is changing its name to Syfy as it tries to move away from the genre’s association with geeks and space aliens, TelevisionWeek reports. The network will launch the new name July 7 when its new series "Warehouse 13" premieres, TVWeek says.
—Jon Lafayette
TVBizWire
March 16, 2009 4:40 AM

Comments (47)
Another example of a network that tries unwittingly to alienate their core audience. They've already done it once by adding wrestling to the channel. I mean, come on, how does that tie in to the genre? Sci-fi is a cool name for a network. Please don't add to the "dumbification" of America by displaying a lack of spelling ability.
Posted by Sofaspud | March 16, 2009 6:29 AM
Well, so much for a cool name. "move away from the genre’s association with geeks and space aliens" I thought that's what they where going for. Some stupid suit told them this would be a great idea. Blah!
Posted by David | March 16, 2009 7:07 AM
This seems really silly. Is it really cool to encourage bad spelling? Is the SciFi channel trying to attract the sort of people that don't know what sci-fi is short for? If so, why?!
Posted by purple | March 16, 2009 7:09 AM
Wresting isn't so bad; I consider it akin to a long commercial -- something the network uses to pay for its real programming. Changing the name, though? Looks iffy to me.
Posted by Mario | March 16, 2009 7:09 AM
It'll probably go the way of TechTV -> G4. I haven't watched that since the changeover. Used to be a great channel that tried to broaden it's niche and failed.
Posted by Brian | March 16, 2009 7:10 AM
Have they done a survey and found the average american thinks SciFi is pronounced 'Skiffy'?
Posted by Mike | March 16, 2009 7:12 AM
No longer will there be channels devoted to individual genre, there will only be the one all encompassing TV with the same reality shows and sports matches. Sci-fi is known for it's science fiction shows, yes it's geeky, but that's the point. If I want to watch a low budget, made-for-tv horror/historical movie, I turn to Sci-fi. If I want to watch some hip new show, I don't. More often than not, I'm watching Sci-fi. Change the name, and eventually the content and it'll be just like PaxTV (what's it called now? Haven't tuned in since the name change). Improving ratings is all well and good, but studio execs have to remember who their dedicated fan base is, alienate them, and you'll be left with an audience who will drop you like the last American Idol.
Posted by NoOneOfImportance | March 16, 2009 7:13 AM
I am 56 yrs old. About 15 yrs ago the local town library decided to free books from their "ghettos" by mainstreaming all new titles. Thus now if you are looking for science fiction and fantasy you can browse thru a clearly defined section of those titles - but you won't find anything less than 15 yrs old. For all the newer books you had better already know the titles and authors before looking for something that might interest you.
I don't believe the policy works with my local library, and I don't understand why they would try it with a cable tv channel. With Internet TV becoming more popular, I thought "narrow-casting" was obviously the way to go.
Posted by Paul Memoli | March 16, 2009 7:15 AM
That's a rather lame decision. If that's the "goal" then the channel's purpose is completely defeated! Well, it's not like there's much actual music on MTV anymore either...maybe they should change their name...at least that would make some sense. Yet another reason why I don't watch TV anymore. Go figure.
Posted by Evie | March 16, 2009 7:18 AM
Sadly, I think the SciFi channel will join the ranks of cable channel obscurity with the likes of Spike, G4, MTV, etc. as soon as Stargate and Battlestar wrap up. It's been proven time and time again that a niche channel dies when it starts trying to serve viewers outside of its original market.
Continue growth by investing in the creation of new content that stays loyal to your niche audience. Trying to draw new viewers by offering reruns of non-scifi syndicated programming... Well, you might as well go jump off the proverbial bridge.
It was nice knowing you, SciFi. You will be missed.
Posted by Jon | March 16, 2009 7:19 AM
This is LAME!
Posted by brg | March 16, 2009 7:21 AM
uh wtf? if it ain't broke don't "fix" it
Syfy is NOT cool in the slightest. Seriously.
Leave Sci Fi alone!
Posted by rant_girl | March 16, 2009 7:29 AM
sigh....why?
Posted by David | March 16, 2009 7:30 AM
Really bad move...
Posted by Hex | March 16, 2009 7:32 AM
There's nothing about this that makes any sense- it's a Sci-Fi Channel, right? They're still going to have SCIence FIction shows on the channel, right? They're still going to show schlocky movies on their "most dangerous night of television," right?
Be what you are- you're not fooling anyone with a poorly spelled name.
If you weren't predisposed to watch "SS Doomtrooper" - i.e. you like "geek" stuff - you will not be persuaded by a name that's now baby talk.
Posted by Chris | March 16, 2009 7:32 AM
OMG it's New Coke all over again.
Posted by Linda | March 16, 2009 7:34 AM
Congratulations on going from a name that has meaning, to a name that has absolutely no meaning to anyone. So people like me, that gravitate to that channel as a direct result of the name and what it insinuates, are now likely to pass right on by it. Just like I do to channels like "Bravo". Oh that's part of NBC too, Go Figure.
Posted by Jeff | March 16, 2009 7:41 AM
Please tell me someone mistook today for April Fools day? Please? Anyone? If not, I fear for ScFi/Syfy's future as a network.
Posted by Christy | March 16, 2009 7:43 AM
I think I just threw up a little bit in my mouth... just a little but there's still an awful taste there.
Posted by John | March 16, 2009 7:50 AM
Wrestling WAS bad enough but this is NOT cool. First of all, the name is stupid. This network name says it could be showing anything (now wrestling makes sense). And then getting away from "genre’s association with geeks and space aliens". That's why I turn to this network. I'd rather see old 30's and 40's science fiction movies than for them to do this. At least that would be considered "campy", nostalgic. (Better than some of the scariest night junk I switch from.) Please keep the network aimed directly at the audience it was intended, the scifi audience. There is so much out there already that is worth seeing again and some of the new stuff could have been really cool. NBC needs better leadership. This is just another example of how dumb these guys are.
Posted by Jack Davis | March 16, 2009 7:59 AM
This just goes to prove that the people in charge have not the slightest clue as to what their customers really want. Don't dumb it down!
Posted by DD Hunter | March 16, 2009 7:59 AM
Wow, a way to really show your viewers that you just really don't get it.
Posted by Marian Martell | March 16, 2009 8:01 AM
AWWWW idin it such a cute name? ACK! THWIPT! chuff! sorry hair ball there. besides totally alienating it's fan base with worthless junk like wrasselin' we know have to put up with executives changing the name to draw in more people that don't get it. SCI-FI people! No more, no less. period.
Posted by Radtrace | March 16, 2009 8:02 AM
I love Sci-Fi the name is awsome, please to don't change it. But I do have one comment.
WTF is up with the wrestling programming. I thought I was on the wrong station when it came on! Please ditch the wrestling. :=-)
Posted by Nomad | March 16, 2009 8:03 AM
uh wtf? if it ain't broke don't "fix" it
Syfy is NOT cool in the slightest. Seriously.
Leave Sci Fi alone!
Posted by rant_girl | March 16, 2009 8:04 AM
They should just change their name to WhyFi...because fans have been asking why they do things for years. Nobody can figure it out.
Farscape is our second highest rated show? Let's cancel it and make them end on a cliffhanger.
Let's cancel SG-1 too...oh wait, let's not...nevermind, let's do it.
SciFi (not SyFy) has had so much potential for the last ten years, but they've completely killed it by attempting to appeal to a broader audience and alienating their core audience rather than strengthening the core.
We saw the same thing happen with G4. That channel started out pretty good (2002/2003 time frame) and had amazing potential, but then they took over TechTV and managed to completely destroy TWO networks in the process. Let's hope that SciFi keeps their destruction limited to themselves.
Posted by PatrickD | March 16, 2009 8:08 AM
Contrary to popular belief, spelling things with a 'y' does not make it any more hip or cool.
I think changing the spelling of the name defeats the whole purpose of the channel.
It's the SciFi channel because it airs science fiction shows. And just changing the name isn't going to make more people watch it. People who stayed away from the 'geeky' or 'nerdy' shows aren't going to suddenly have a geek epiphany and start watching the channel.
Posted by Brittany | March 16, 2009 8:08 AM
No! Come on, SciFi, why would you do that? "Syfy" isn't cool; it's ridiculous. Why are we trying to irritate the core audience, anyway? Aren't there enough channels aimed at the so-called normal crowd?
Posted by Michelle | March 16, 2009 8:09 AM
what a dumb idea...
Posted by Brandon | March 16, 2009 8:24 AM
Coming soon to the new SyFy lineup.
House 2050, the curmudgeonly cybernetic diagnostician with the faulty leg hydraulics.
CSI:Luna One, watch the team solve crimes on the moon.
Law and Order: Robotic Crimes Unit, New York's finest investigate violations of the 3 laws of robotics.
Posted by David | March 16, 2009 8:39 AM
Sy Fy sounds like the name of an Icelandic vaudeville booking agent.
Numbnuts decision.
Posted by Robbo | March 16, 2009 8:41 AM
I think they should just call it "Sigh-FYE", then they could broadcast Wrestling, Dr. Who, AND Trading Spaces
Posted by Jeff Rask | March 16, 2009 8:58 AM
What these people fail to understand is that "cool" and "popular" are mutually exclusive terms.
Example: JRR Tolkien's works were cool until the LOTR movies came out and everyone and their dog started writing fanfic about Orlando Bloom.
Posted by hjk | March 16, 2009 9:01 AM
All the beautiful "frakking" swag I've treasured from Comic-Con stamped with "Scifi" just became orphans kicked to the curb.
Posted by SD Stu | March 16, 2009 9:02 AM
Maybe they can just call it 'The we make really crappy movies starring Dean Cain and oh yea we have Wrestling' network?
This feels like a dumb April Fool's joke.
Posted by Greg | March 16, 2009 9:03 AM
Dumb.
Posted by JPM | March 16, 2009 9:05 AM
That is just so lame. Just when SciFi is getting more popular than ever, they try to distance themselves from the genre? LAME.
Posted by Tania | March 16, 2009 9:05 AM
My analysis is that some talentless VP network exec was afraid of being laid off and started this long-term renaming project to stay on the payroll.
Posted by Leanopoe | March 16, 2009 9:11 AM
Very absurd its all I have to say. For many years the brand SciFi have been very succesful. Why do you want to kill brand name that has bring so much to a specific audience? $$$$$$ Ex: Stargate, Atlantis, Battlestar Galactica, and many others. NBC, you are doing bad choices here. Like Jay Leno will not bring the rating that NBC is expecting at 9:00 PM.
Posted by Elvyn Villanueva | March 16, 2009 9:15 AM
That's "Change" for ya! It's a White House conspiracy!
Posted by Otreborthe1 | March 16, 2009 9:23 AM
Siffy? They want their name to sound like "Siffy" ?
Good call.
Posted by Mike | March 16, 2009 9:31 AM
Most ridiculous thng I ever heard of. I was considering cutting back on my packages on the satellite dish, this just made my decision easier. We all know this is the begining of the end. Hello!!! Is anyone out there. Damn corporate monkeys. WTF
Posted by Darrin | March 16, 2009 9:33 AM
is it just me or does that sound like a wierd way to explain syphilis? "O' dear, you have syfi"
Other than that. why mess with what works? And drop the wrestling. Sci-Fi fans dont watch it.
Posted by Bear_myth | March 16, 2009 9:55 AM
This is one of the most ridiculous ideas I have heard. I concur with other posters in this comment thread -- SciFi, the channel, will wither up and die with this name change due to alienating most people who would otherwise watch it. The only reason for me to have cable has been this channel, but this is another easy reason to get rid of cable, and stick with rabbit ears, since I don't need, and won't want, to watch t.v. anymore.
Posted by Sonya | March 16, 2009 9:59 AM
This is a stupid move. Remember when Coke thought it would change the flavor of its world-conquering beverage back in the 1980s only to change it back a little while later? This is the same stupid mistake.
I already had a very low opinion of the station because of its awful TV movies and offensively repetitive commercial scheme, but this makes it certain I'll never watch them again.
Posted by ZorkFox | March 16, 2009 10:54 AM
Usually, there are at least a few disagreements in a thread of comments this long, but ALL of the coments are agreeing that this is a stupid idea. AMAZING! I really hope someone in a high enough spot at NBC reads through all of these comments and changes the person, or at least the mind of the person, that came up with this. SciFi IS Science Fiction. Who knows what SyFy(Siffie)is supposed to be...
Posted by BC | March 16, 2009 10:55 AM
Please do not change the SCI FI name! I have been a fan since day one. I know how to spell, like the current name, and think the new name is lame!!!
Posted by Patrick Green | March 16, 2009 10:56 AM