As Local Sharing Progresses, New Concerns Emerge

Aug 2, 2009  •  Post A Comment

By Hillary Atkin

New. Experimental. Here to Stay?

That would be the tease for the rapidly spreading practice of fiercely competitive television stations joining to pool their resources as a way to reduce costs and expand coverage.

The pooling of broadcast news video, also known as local news sharing (LNS), is a concept that has caught fire in recent months—but not without controversy—and is under way in several dozen markets, including all five of the nation’s largest DMAs.

“In these challenging economic times, we began discussions on how to be more efficient,” said Sharri Berg, senior VP of news operations for Fox Television Stations, which has 12 of its stations participating with local competitors in news-pooling arrangements. “The result was not only cost efficiency, but this gave us flexibility in directing our own unilateral resources. If we’re covering a local news conference, if a station wants to send a reporter, it’s their choice. LNS in no way constrains or dictates, but in fact gives stations more options.”

Many major station groups are taking part, including stations affiliated with and/or owned by the NBC Television Network, Tribune Broadcasting, Gannett Broadcasting, CBS Broadcasting, Scripps Television Station Group, McGraw-Hill Broadcasting and Sinclair Broadcast Group.

The practice is not without critics, however, who argue that it decreases competition, costs jobs, blurs the individuality of stations and limits the ability to cover stories.

There’s no question about the financial benefits, however. “We’ve got to be smarter businessmen,” said Steve Charlier, senior VP of news and operations at Tribune Broadcasting stations. “Our goal was to operate efficiently and improve content, and be able to grow, to put more bodies in the street, and have more content.”

The practice of pooling broadcast video is not a new one, and has long gone on in courtrooms, at concerts and sporting events, and in other controlled or restricted situations where multiple cameras might create havoc. It’s also similar to in-house broadcast network feeds, which have existed for decades.

“Production sharing is going to become increasingly common,” said Richard Hanley, assistant professor of journalism at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Conn. “It happened with newspapers, who forged joint operating agreements and shared printing facilities. So this is not unusual for media companies to share production costs, and television news is no different. It’s a reality of the moment and the future. As long as there are still separate reporters, I don’t think it’s a fatal issue to media.”

Philadelphia was the first market to begin the LNS venture in January 2009, after an agreement was announced between Fox and NBC Local Media for WCAU-NBC 10 and WTXF-FOX 29 to share video, following a trial run between the two news departments that began the previous summer.

While individually retaining all other aspects of their news-gathering operations, the stations went to work gathering and distributing general market video coverage through a separate LNS entity staffed with 19 experienced assignment editors, photographers and management. Meanwhile, each station pursued the goal of using its own resources to focus on other specialized reporting.

The arrangement has evolved from pooling video obtained at basic bread-and-butter daily news events like press conferences, speeches and court hearings. “It really has exceeded our expectations in terms of coverage,” said Kingsley Smith, VP and news director of WTXF-TV. “We have 6½ hours of news on every day. The LNS shoots 25 to 45 stories a day and plays a big part in helping with coverage we have not been able to get. It is a content provider that picks up a lot of community stuff and good local flavor. It’s evolved to where the LNS has enterprised its own stories and pitched them to the stations.”

Yet even as costs have gone down—although no one is yet specifying how much—and story count has gone up (an estimated 20 percent at some stations), media watchdogs have questioned how such arrangements affect coverage and impact the viewing audience’s favorable feelings for local stations.

Jill Geisler, faculty member at the Poynter Institute, is concerned about what she called the hazards of pooling, including diluted coverage, missing contacts and stories in the halls of power, the potential proliferation of staged events, the fact that pooling may save money but not jobs—and that non-pool players may escape all these hazards. In a June article for PoynterOnline, she called on news directors to exercise leadership and evaluate these risks to prove that pool coverage can make sense economically and journalistically.

While news-pooling arrangements are fast becoming standard operating procedure, many local news leaders—including ABC O&Os in Los Angeles, New York and Chicago—are choosing not to participate. News executives at some of those stations have said that going it alone makes them stronger and more unique in the marketplace. Behind the scenes they have been concerned that jumping into the pool would prop up their weakest competitors.

After a six-week trial run in the news pool, Meredith Corp.’s Atlanta station, WGCL-TV, recently took its toes out of the water it had shared with Fox O&O WAGA-TV and Gannett’s WXIA-TV, saying the pool limited its ability to cover different stories. Yet Meredith said it remains committed to the concept—its Phoenix station is on board—and Fox executives are circumspect about the pullout.

“With anything new you have to give it time and become comfortable with the concept and expectations,” said Berg. “You have to be committed to make it work. If you believe in the concept it will work. It depends on the market; each market is different. Some LNSes cover more breaking news, some cover a broader output of community events. We look at what types of news they’re covering every week, making sure all stations are getting what they need.”

Yet perhaps the biggest concern of all among working broadcast journalists is job loss.

“Each station pays for two individuals, and they get four for free,” said a 20-year veteran photographer at one of the three Los Angeles stations participating in LNS, who did not wish to be identified. “It’s a terrible idea. Eventually they’re going to cry wolf, say they have no money and expand the idea—and more people will be laid off. Are writers next? It has really lousy prospects, in my opinion.”

He said he is not only concerned about losing the work, but losing the competitive edge that his station prides itself upon. “You want coverage, yet you’re not willing to pay for it? You want to compete? Hire extra reporters. It’s work that belongs to us, and they’re basically getting it for nothing,” the photographer said.

“If it was about slashing jobs, how would we still cover news and keep the industry thriving?” Berg said. “Yes, sharing a chopper can save half a million dollars, helping make the best use of our resources. LNS is an important component in that.”

At Tribune’s stations, Charlier said the LNS has not contributed to any cutbacks that have been made, and that some of the stations have added news hours, and hope to add more. “We haven’t made a direct layoff as a result of LNS,” he said.

“How we’re using this strategy is that it provides us a window to grow in a tough economy,” Charlier said. “It’s to make us smarter operators and have more content. Not only is the economy tough, people have short attention spans, and we work hard to earn their attention. As always, content is king. This is how we branch out,
focusing on the rest of the material in the day’s newscasts.”

47 Comments

  1. These don’t really strike me as “new” concerns. They’re the same theoretical concerns that were raised when this all started. Unless someone can weigh in with something new, experience-based… move along, nothing to see here.

  2. Any real TV journalist knows that it’s the interaction between cameraperson and reporter, the melding of pictures with narrative, that makes great packages. This scenario virtually assures that the sausage factory grinds out gristle, not prime cuts. Then there’s the antitrust angle. You people make your money on the public’s airwaves. The least you can do is give them the best original product you can produce. Where are the unions on this? Are there any unions left? This cost-cutting move sacrifices content, quality, jobs and competition. Call in the trust-busters and the unionists!

  3. I don’t discount the need to save money, but what I REALLY hate about this is the way the group heads will describe it as not hurting the news products.
    Many of them go so far as to say news-sharing will improve the product.
    How insulting! Do they really think the front-line people who are often getting paid less to do more really are THAT stupid?

  4. Sharing helicopters makes sense, but sharing news stories does not. My fear is where will it all end? One or two photographer/reporters flitting around from story to story for producers and anchors to write and voice over to make everyone’s product look the same. You’ll get lousy video, poor audio and you won’t be able to trust the information either. The public is the big loser here.

  5. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  6. Discovered this page on by coincidence! today and really appreciated it… I bookmarked it and will return to look it over a bit of extra information along with comments in the future.

  7. nice information !!

  8. This is my first time here and i am likeing your website , and this post is just good, keep it up man

  9. I added Google Reader to your site when I have spare time try to follow.

  10. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  11. Simply wanted to say hi and inform you that I have lately been returning on this site for many years, continually hanging out within the dark areas and not necessarily talking my own head. Well its certainly time to settle my personal admiration and inform your family, as a typical subscriber the fact that My partner and i actually enjoy ones own rrnternet site and expect you’ll continue about this particular religious quest of terms. Hey there from myself

  12. I subscribed – because I thought the post was great – hard to find alot of the time.

  13. Great blog!! You should start many more. I love all the info provided. I will stay tuned :)

  14. You did the logo. I want to do something like that.

  15. I added Google Reader to your site when I have spare time try to follow.

  16. link please :(((

  17. I found your site via google thanks for the post. I will bookmark it for future reference. Thanks

  18. Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article

  19. Great blog!! You should start many more. I love all the info provided. I will stay tuned :)

  20. Hi, I like your article. This is a good site and I wanted to post a little note to tell you, great job!

  21. I mean, I could see all this fuss over the guy if he’d led Jersey to the Finalswholesale cheap nhl nfl jerseys

  22. En güzel erotik filmler burada.

  23. I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you create this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz reply back as I’m looking to create my own blog and would like to know wheere u got this from. thanks

  24. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  25. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  26. Kvepalai pigiau

  27. I am extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one these days.. :)

  28. High quality info here! Keep up the great work. I love the feelings being expressed.

  29. Amazing freakin blog here. I almost cried while reading it!

  30. Love the blog here. Nice colors. I am definitely staying tuned to this one. Hope to see more.

  31. I really like the colors here on your blog. did you design this yourself or did you outsource it to a professional?

  32. I am extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one these days.. :)

  33. I like your blog.

  34. Nice!! Great Ifo. Great People. Great Blog. Thank you for all the great sharing that is being done here.

  35. Good story over again! Thumbs up;)

  36. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  37. Good post once again. Thank you!

  38. This is such a fantastic resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing internet websites that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. It’s the old what goes around comes around routine. Regards…

  39. Considerably, this post is really the sweetest on this notable topic. I harmonise with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your incoming updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the phenomenal clarity in your writing. I will directly grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates. Admirable work and much success in your business dealings!  Please excuse my poor English as it is not my first tongue.

  40. Nice blog subject. thanks for letting me add something!

  41. Hi I actually your ideas very much. I saw your blog on Bing and I am sure you will receive many visitors.

  42. Kudos for the great piece of writing. I am glad I have taken the time to read this.

  43. Thanks for the great post.

  44. Can I just speak what a elimination en route for discover someone who truly knows what theyre discussion about on top of the the web. You unquestionably tell how toward transport an topic to glow plus build it significant. More public need to read this and realize this side of the narrative. I cant consider youre not additional fashionable because you certainly have the gift.

  45. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  46. Just wanted to say this blog is almost amazing.I always like to hear something new because I have the similar blog in my Country on this so this helps me a lot. I did search on the topic and found good number of blogs but nothing like this. Thanks for sharing so much in your blog.. Greets., Wilma Brichetto

  47. in last day i was read a article on your website and i was added a commet and ask a question but you didnt approval my commet. i didnt get my questions answer.

Your Comment

Email (will not be published)