“I was disappointed and surprised by the decision. It did not seem inappropriate to have a little glitz and glamour on a night when Americans might have needed a breather. The best thing celebrities can do right now is entertain us.”
Neal Justin, television critic, Minneapolis Star Tribune
“I think [they] should have gone ahead with the telecast. There’s a certain amount of self-importance cloaked in patriotism that I find off-putting. … But to schedule a third attempt at a prime-time broadcast would just be silly now.”
Richard Roeper, co-host, “Ebert & Roeper”/columnist, Chicago Sun-Times
“Since we [were] continuing with sporting events and such, why not? It could [have provided] a harmless diversion. On the other hand, the show may be bad luck. Each time it is scheduled, something bad happens.”
Marty Renzhofer, television critic, Salt Lake (City, Utah) Tribune
Quick Takes: Should the Primetime Emmy Awards have aired as scheduled on Oct. 7?
Oct 15, 2001 • Post A Comment