Logo

Did Lee Harvey Oswald Act Alone? TV Series Unearths New Evidence in JFK Assassination

Apr 17, 2017  •  Post A Comment

A new nonfiction series premiering next week examines new evidence in the JFK assassination and explores new theories in an effort to determine whether Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. History rolled out plans for “JFK Declassified: Tracking Oswald,” which premieres Tuesday, April 25.

The limited series will air in six parts.

“More than 2 million declassified government files offer new evidence about Lee Harvey Oswald’s activities in the weeks, months and years before the assassination of President John F. Kennedy with the last remaining documents scheduled for release later this year,” History notes in its announcement.

The series tracks former CIA agent Bob Baer and former LAPD police lieutenant Adam Bercovici on an independent global investigation into Oswald and the JFK assassination. The program wraps on Tuesday, May 30, during the week that would have marked JFK’s 100th birthday.

“Working alongside elite investigative experts and utilizing state-of-the-art analysis algorithms to examine these top secret files, Baer and his team travel to Moscow, Mexico City, New Orleans, Miami and Dallas to track down every lead and retrace Oswald’s steps with the goal of separating conspiracy theory from the truth,” the announcement notes. “While on the ground in Mexico, the team discovers new clues that suggest a deeper connection between Oswald and the Soviet KGB. Declassified documents reveal that Oswald met with the Cold War enemies of the United States, both Russia and Cuba, only eight weeks before JFK’s assassination.”

The announcement adds: “Following evidence from these declassified files, Baer’s investigation tracks down a former KGB agent and other eyewitnesses who, for the first time on camera, speak about personally meeting with Oswald only weeks before he changed the course of American history. Among the most compelling evidence are police documents that connect Oswald to a suspected ‘safe house’ in Dallas where he could have hidden after the assassination.”

“JFK Declassified: Tracking Oswald” is produced for History by Karga Seven Pictures. Sarah Wetherbee, Kelly McPherson, Emre Sahin, Tracy Bacal and Brian Skope are executive producers for Karga Seven Pictures. Jennifer Wagman and Stephen Mintz are executive producers for History.

44 Comments

  1. Gee, History Channel, isn’t this conveeeeeenient.

  2. This is more JFK Assassination conspiracy nonsense — a topic that the shameless “History” channel has been milking for decades. There is no “new evidence,” no new “witnesses” and certainly no credible “algorithms” that can shed light on the fact on this murder.

    Those interested in a truly exhaustive and credible investigation into these events should read the late Vincent Bugliosi’s massive “Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy.” Not the 400 page synopsis, but the full 1600 page version plus the two CD’s of original files and evidence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reclaiming_History

  3. You are so correct. There is no credible evidence proving anything but the copnclusion the Warren Commission found. There was some very interesting meetings Oswald had in Mexico City…with Cubans and Russians, but he had no way to know JFK was to be in Dallas later that Fall. And if this production makes any sort of claim that Jim Garrison and New Orleans was somehow involved, it’s more crap. It’s rather amazing to me how many believe they can “become someone” by solving this alleged puzzle. Many have tried, but manufactured “facts” somehow fade in the light of honest evaluation.

    • You can’t possibly have read anything about the Kennedy assassination beyond the superficial claptrap from the mainstream media. The Warren Commission delivered a fable from top to bottom.

    • You are so right, Hugh. I recently watched a local forum with you sitting next to Buell Wesley Frazier, and I had to take note of your admirable patience with a few of the statements he made. Now I think that man is sincere, but not a good observer of the package Oswald carried into the building that day–he admitted he didn’t pay much attention to it at any time–plus he was more interested in making sure his car battery didn’t die. He also doesn’t seem to be aware of the fact that most of us, including those who commit serious crimes, have at least one or two items in our respective personalities that could be said to be admirable or at minimum have redeeming value. I can accept Oswald was kind to children, but by the same token, he killed two men that day and seriously wounded another man.
      The biggest problem with the public in this matter is that the television and radio news media of the day in particular got so many parts of this story wrong and disseminated the inaccuracies so widely that these got assimilated into the public consciousness and only increased the widespread fear afoot that some war was about to happen and this was the opening shot in it. The other rather instantaneous and indelible impression was left with the Ruby murder of Oswald that whatever suspicions of darkness behind the scenes anyone felt before that event then seemed certain in the minds of many. The media did not timely or effectively ever attempt to clear up this mass erroneousness, and because nature does indeed abhor a vacuum, what came into this vacuum was every theory of every kind, replete with using premises over and over which are demonstrably false. There were glaring procedural errors, the most notable of which was the removal of the body of the President from Dallas over the objection of the local coroner. This allowed even more preventable confusion and error and misinterpretation of facts to occur, even if it was done for the reason of keeping peace in the mind of the new President and with the murdered President’s widow. The Warren Commission narrative was far from perfect–it got the sequence of the shots clearly wrong, and it compressed as a result the time frame a tad during which three shots had to have been fired. It was probably a bit too hard on Secret Service agents for the activities the night before, because ultimately this couldn’t have made much difference under the circumstances. It failed to understand and report the simple fact that had railings been built into the back of the limo so that agents could stand up and hold on thereto, this would have been an improvement and might have resulted in a better outcome. In an attempt to find a motive that was in essence not findable, it adopted some vague psychologic theory as to motive. All in all, the Commission made several mistakes and those are not all of them,most people have not read all 26 volumes and as I recall the government didn’t make the report very affordable when this report came out, but as to basic conclusion, it did a remarkably solid job. What perhaps is the most frustrating thing in popular culture is the fact that conspiracists continually point to Gov. Connally’s testimony stating that the first shot did not strike him, then he was hit, and then the President was hit. This comports perfectly well with what is seen on the Zapruder Film and the fact that the first shot missed, ricocheted off the light pole and the street, which is probably why most people heard it as a firecracker. James Tague, a bystander far down the street near the triple underpass, was struck in the face with this ricochet. The second shot hit JFK in the upper back and exited his throat, started tumbling as all experiments on these bullets have shown happens, struck Connally in the back flat-on, and fractured a rib, hit a wrist bone, went into his thigh, and then apparently in moving around fell onto the floor. This was not a pristine bullet at all, as it was flattened exactly as ballistics experiments predicted it would be. Neither was it a magic bullet as contrary to what conspiracists claim from the erroneous drawing in the Warren Commission, which angles and heights between JFK and Connally are wrong, and this ammunition was war ammunition designed to penetrate bodies just as it did. How it got onto the stretcher was by a Secret Service agent who noticed it, picked it up, and put it in a stretcher in the hospital. No Jack Ruby needed for such a dark deed. The supposed grassy knoll shot never existed because JFK’s head wound simply wasn’t compatible with that angle of entry–nor was the blood spatter pattern, nor were the X-Rays.
      The idea that Ruby was part of a conspiracy fails the smell test based on the simple facts that Ruby had no intention of going anywhere that day until he got a call from one of his dancers demanding money, and he went to wire that money, taking his dogs with him. Taking a gun with him wasn’t unusual for him, particularly when he carried money on him. And then, Oswald’s transfer was late. If Ruby was told he had to shoot Oswald at that likely only post-assassination point in time he could possibly have done so, and that somehow his life would be in danger if he didn’t do so, then he was remarkably casual about the time involved–so remarkably casual that this theory doesn’t hold up. Conspiracy in a strict sense fails in this case. What Oswald’s contacts were before the assassination could provide insight as to his motive quite obviously, and that is the only loose end to tie up here. This “safe house” is also not a new idea, but if the series isn’t shown for some reason, who among us will discover what these folks say about it? I smell a television program with lots of hype, and very littl– if any– new information.

  4. I don’t believe an idiot like Oswald pulled it off. Pro snipets couldn’t do that many shots that quick with bolt action rifle. Also, LBJ locked down files 76 years…hmm, everyone would be long gone. He was number one motive.

    • Yep, I still wonder why LBJ conveniently had his mother’s Bible on Air Force One, so he could be sworn in. Does anyone believe he just always carried his mother’s Bible? Puhleeze. Why was that not investigated?

      • LBJ was sworn in on JFK’s personal bible, NOT his mother’s bible. Read William Manchester’s “The Death of a President”

        • You’re both wrong. LBJ placed his hand on JFK’s Roman Catholic Missal, which is a sort of prayer book–not a Bible.
          Does this mean he was not officially President at that moment? What if he raised his left hand to solemnly swear? What if he raised no hand at all? Read the Constitution, and then listen to George Carlin. LOL

    • There were 3 shots fired. Oswald only fired 2 shots. Connolly fired the third shot trying to get his revolver out, hitting himself (there was NO “magic bullet!”).
      Somebody needs to due some serious research on this issue. This fact has been buried!

  5. For those who would like a different view, check out http://www.fixthebus.com, then scroll over to JFK. Oswald definitely had help. Unfortunately, most people who speak about the Kennedy assassination have never read one word of the testImony or given it more than five minutes of thought.

  6. As the CIA is in up to its neck in coup of 11/22/63, having a CI type as your lead investigator is poor. More important, the Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 calls for the release of all files in October of 2017. My guess is this program is a way to make the release seem unimportant. But it is most important. Anyone really after truth would push this program back until the release and reading of the many million of pages to be released.

  7. It’s kind of funny how someone is blaming the Russians again.
    That would mean that everything I’ve watched and read is wrong as to who is responsible for the assassination of JFK as would be many other independent sources.
    I’m looking forward to seeing what they have to say only because I firmly believe this is another lame attempt at out government trying to cover up a crime and create a false narrative just like they did with the Warren Report.
    LBJ was one of the most corrupt politicians and Presidents we ever had.
    There have already been some deathbed confessions and interviews most notably by E. howard Hunt.
    The only people that will believe this nonsense is the causal observer who doesn’t have much interest in who was actually responsible for killing President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

  8. It’s kind of funny how someone is blaming the Russians again. Is this just a coincidence?
    That would mean that everything I’ve watched and read over the past many years is wrong as to who is responsible for the assassination of JFK as would be many other very credible independent sources.
    I’m looking forward to seeing what they have to say only because I firmly believe this is another lame attempt at our government trying to cover up a crime and create a false narrative just like they did with the Warren Report and have been trying to do since then.
    LBJ was one of the most corrupt politicians and Presidents we ever had.
The CIA and FBI have already been found complicit/guilty in the assassination of Martin Luther King in a case brought against the US Government by the King Family.
    There have already been some deathbed confessions and interviews most notably by E. howard Hunt.
    All the information and pieces are out there to put it all together as to who was involved and it’s not pretty
    The only people that will believe this nonsense is the causal observer who doesn’t have much interest in who was actually responsible for killing our own President, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

  9. Why lock files up if it was simply the act of a “lone nut” ? What is there to hide ? Things that make you go hmmm .

  10. The real most basic question on the whole matter is who made the call? Once one begins to understand who had the power to put whatever plan happened in motion, the reasons become clearer. Most everyone believes the Warren Commission and the Lone Gunman is pure fabrication. If 11/23/63 was truly a Coup d’état, who set it in motion? We need to understand the WHY before who can be known.

  11. How predictable another farcical documentary which is designed to create confusion. Smoke and mirrors.
    Don’t be fooled. Oswald was nothing more than the pasty.

    • Yeah, and in addition to his poor skin tone, he took the fall for those higher up the food chain!
      I know this because Greg said so.
      At least, I think that’s what he meant.
      Unless it was something about Oswald being a small decoration covering up the nipple on a large boob.
      Which I suppose in a symbolic sense might also be true.

  12. Another load of History Channel dog-poop from more people trying to make money off the Kennedy assassination. Read “Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK” (1993) by Gerald Posner. He debunks the various conspiracy theories.

    One example was a man the History Channel showed on one of their many phoney Kennedy conspiracy stories, who claimed to be an eyewitness to someone shooting Kennedy from the grass knoll. Posner proved that this liar was in Alaska at the time of the assassination. STOP AIRING THIS GARBAGE, HISTORY CHANNEL!!

  13. This is not rocket science. the Zapruder film clearly shows 2 bullets ( different kinds of bullets.. Two different directions, and Jackie Kennedy reaching to the back of the limo for a piece of his brain.. then she cups it to his head all the way to the hostipal, (she spoke about this in Esquire magazine..there is only one way that blood splatter and skull ended up in that direction.. like being shot from the direction behind the picket fence..Oswald had nothing to do with this murder, which is why he was shot 2 days later.. To shut him up forever…Kennedy was bringing troops out of Viet-Nam and the warhawks couldnt go for that. All this business about Oswald going to Russia and to Mexico made him the perfect Patsy.. It was all provided by Oswald friend George DeMornshildt who was an employee of George Bush and Prescott Bush both with the CIA.. Lets see a History Channel special about this.. complete with the death bed confessions of E.Howard Hunt..

  14. Just some thoughts:
    -The audio of the shots captured by the motorcycle policeman’s open microphone proved that the shots were too close together for Oswald to have fired them
    -The autopsy photos certainly do not match eye witness testimony of witnesses or doctors or staff of Parkland Hospital
    -JFK and RFK went after the mob-and considering the FBI ran by Hoover had laid off the mob since the mid 1950’s, they had a very good motive
    -LBJ reversed an executive order to keep troops in Nam
    -Oswald shoots the president and doesn’t have an exit plan? If he was CIA or even hired by the mob, would they take the chance of the guy spilling beans with names and such information?
    -Ruby stated the world will never know of his motives as to why he did it, but his lawyer based their case on a crime of passion
    I’m not a conspiracy guy but I have read a lot about this. Too many things just don’t add up to what the government told us and considering the government has lied to us time and time again, I certainly am cautious to believe them.

    • This so-called acoustic evidence was totally debunked years ago and it isn’t worth a warm bucket of chew spit. Not only was H.B. McLain’s motorcycle NOT where the these acoustic experts said it had to be in order for their analysis to be correct. In addition, the words “hold everything secure” were heard on the recording and those words were spoken at least a minute AFTER the assassination.

  15. Bob Baer started off by saying Oswald was in Mexico City. Where is the evidence of that? Their was a picture of a man that was suppose to be Oswald and it was a man that was husky build and looked nothing like Oswald. Bob Baer being one of the top CIA agents is just doing his old boss George Herbert Walker a favor before he dies by trying to take the light the has been shown on Bush being in Dealey Plaza during the shooting. Their is a picture of Bush being their and also a J Edgar Hoover memo stating a George Bush a oil man from Texas calling in with a tip. The CIA involvement has come to light since 11/22/63 and a CIA lifer named Bob Baer is just doing what he does best lie,decieve and spread disinformation.

  16. One important thing I forgot to add about Bush is that he can’t remember where he was on 11/22/63. Anyone that was a kid on the day JFK was murdered or older has the memory ingrained with them for life. It is the equivalent to my memory on 911 and anyone can relate to that.

    You tube Bush giving Gerald Ford’s eulogy and George Herbert Walker chuckles during the eulogy while he mentions a loan gunman kill’s President Kennedy.

    The CIA is still withholding their documents on the assassination,why don’t they release them? The members of the plot are still alive.

  17. Great comments, I agree with all. This is part of the disinformation campaign I have watched each year before November, since 1963. This year it preempts the release of docs in October (the date of which designed to survive most of us doubters), and is also politically expedient to try to put blame on Cuba & Russia, at a time when reestablished relationships with Cuba has occurred and is likely as unpopular with the current US gov’t as it was then. Oswald was a Patsy, nothing more. Case closed.

  18. This show will not mention any of the many things that are real issues with the assassination. The shows purpose is to seem like it wants to discover the plot to kill John Kennedy but it’s real purpose is to mislead us to what really happened.

    I hope the young generation that is going to watch this show looks at it the assassination like it should be, threw hard evidence and if something doesn’t seem right it isn’t right. Please read or watch eyewitness testimony to the assassination and watch the Zapruder film. You have to ask yourself why was the Zapruder film hidden from public view for thirteen years? Why are their splices and alteration’s done in the film? Technology has come a long way since 1963 and the film can not hold up to today’s technology. Their is a crude blackish blog covering the back of JFK head to hide the massive blow out from a frontal shot. Before the car goes under the under pass it shows Connolly sitting up in the back seat next to JFK.

    The show could talk about the photo of the badge man shooting a gun from the Grassy Knoll.

    It could mention the image of people shooting from the Dal Tex building. Or Lyndon Johnson ducking in his car before anyone knew that shots were being fired,but he knew what was coming.

    We could go on and on and on about evidence that has been discovered by researchers but they never want to mention the hard evidence like Malcolm Wallace’s fingerprint that was found in the Texas school Book Depository because that links Johnson to the murder and links George Herbert Walker Bush. Both men were close to Wallace. Lyndon Johnson’s hitman was Wallace,George Bush was in Skull in Bones with Wallace.

    The one thing that tells us that this was a very well organized and executed event is that Kennedy was gunned down in broad day light and our government took the crime seen out of Dallas which was Kennedy’s Lincoln limousine and flew it to Washington. The car was torn down to bare sheet metal and rebuilt. I would like any Kennedy skeptic to tell me the justification for destroying the crime scene. Why would they do that? Only one reason explains it, coverup !!!!

    It would be great if President Trump releases The CIA documents that are due to come out this year. President Trump is the only one that can deny their release. If he decide’s he dose’nt is it because he’s afraid that the CIA once again will put a team in action?

    President Trump wanted to build a relationship with Russia and he is being forced to drive a wedge between us and Russia since he has taken office. Then we have this show now with Bob Baer trying to pin the murder of President Kennedy to Oswald and Russia.

    I think it is laughable. The government and Media continue to manipulate us with these bogus tv shows false information and most people fall for it.

    It is time for the Government to be transparent for a change and release the rest of the files and let the CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA know what exactly what they have been hiding from us so we can heal as a country.

    • You have clearly lost your ever-loving mind. There is absolutely NO blob on the Zapruder film hiding anything. What the hell have you been smoking? I’ve seen the Zapurder film a thousand times and I work with programs like After Effects every day of my life. The technology for this type of fakery didn’t exist in 1963 and there in no evidence of tampering or after-the-fact animation in the Z-film. NONE. Cell animation or very crude blue screen combined with optical printing were the only two methods they would have had in 1963 to attempt changes and there is NONE of that in the Zapruder film. Those techniques are crap at best even when you are working with 35mm film stock. The Z-film was 8mm! There is no attempt to animate away a frontal shot, that is all in your ridiculous imagination.

  19. More bogus information. By a former CIA agent no less! Read any of the most recent research, and you will find that it fully backs up all the Warren Commission disbelievers from the past . Read Douglas Horne, a former government employee of the ARRB. Read James Douglas . Read Dr. David Mantik. The list goes on. This History Channel series is just more drivel alone lines of Poster and Bulgulosi.One last comment. This is the same so called researcher that did Finding Hitler on History.Hitler escaped…really…?.?

  20. That was supposed to say..along the lines of Posner

  21. Oh, and a p.s. ..the last real History Channel attempt at a real documentary called The Men Who Killed Kennedy a number of years ago. They ended up pulling the most serious episode (s). And it was later banned. Hmm? I suppose someone showed them the real Zappruder film.

  22. I noticed that the “JFK declassified series” has been pulled from the schedule. Does anyone know why? It was suppoded to air on 5/9/17, but i see that History has put reruns of Forged in Fire to replace.

  23. What happened to this series? Why is it no longer on the schedule?

  24. they pulled the show!
    WOW
    WHY
    its just a tv show after all

  25. If you want the most believable story read
    Doctor Mary’s Monkey
    Then read
    Me and Lee or it might be Lee and Me – the author Judyth Vary Baker was Oswalds girlfriend when he was married. She is still alive and swears Oswald did not do it

    Best books I have ever read

  26. Hey Js if you go to the Z film online their is a up close view of Kennedy’s head that show’s a crude blackish blob that covers the back of the head. Their are all different youtube videos and one speaks about hollywood film directors that have studied the film and are afraid to come out publicly and speak about the forgeries throughout the entire film. Their is most certainly a crude blackish or dark bluish blob covering the back of his head. Try goggling hollywood is studying the Z film. The forgeries in the film do not hold up to today’s technology. I think JS need’s to grow a brain and become a independent thinker. He apparently has not read any eye witness testimony including the doctor’s that worked on President Kennedy. The doctors and witnesses did not have any dog in the fight. The crime scene was removed from Dallas as well as the body which was illegal since the autopsy was suppose to be held in Dallas. If a assassination happened today no way in the world could it happened like it happened in Dallas. The internet would have all the information on it in minutes. Do you think that in 2017 they could take the crime scene and the body out of it’s proper jurisdiction? The answer is no. Their was a massive plot and cover-up 11/22/63 and all you have to ask yourself is how was the secret service able to steal the body and destroy the crime scene? If that happened today they would be in jail. All you have to do in this case is apply common sense and anyone with a brain beside JS can ask simple questions and see that their was a plot and a cover-up. The only answers we don’t have definitely is who can we prove was a part in the plot and cover-up. Their are a lot of fingers that point to the CIA or mob because back in the sixties you couldn’t tell the two apart. The cover-up is easy LBJ and J Edgar Hoover. Those were the two people that controlled and manipulated the Warren Commission report. Please anyone that looks into the assassination read eyewitness testimony and then see how the evidence of the crime scene which is the limo was taken and destroyed and body taken out of it’s jurisdiction for a autopsy and cover-up. Common sense is all that is needed in this case. PS. JS just give up,it’s to tough for you to understand.

  27. Something was very troubling between the first and second programs in this series. In the first, Baer was all gung-ho on the Russian angle, promoting his knowledge of intelliegence agency techniques to insist that denials of the Russians of meeting with Oswald for any sinister purpose was certainly not credible;then in the second program, supposedly based on one face to face with this old KGB agent who as all the others before him stated the KGB had no interest in Oswald at any time, “I believe him.” All of a sudden Baer believes this one KGB agent–while before he refused to believe these denials of KGB agents. This comes out as not credible.
    I did hear Baer on a radio show recently state that this was not his project alone and he did not make many decisions about the production. What this means ultimately is anyone’s guess as apparently the show has been pulled from the air. What’s behind that will be interesting to learn about.

  28. I think what it comes down to Endrun is that it is a television show. We really can’t trust that information. The first show starts off by saying Oswald went to the Russia and Cuban embassy. Their are surveillance photo’s that you can look up online that show the man that is suppose to be Oswald clearly looks nothing at all like him. The show wasn’t go to show or tell you that. The show clearly had a agenda to steer us towards a Russian Oswald connection or a Oswald Cuban connection, or both. I think the intention was to make it seem like their was a connection their and then pull the show to make it seem like oh that must be the truth that’s why they cancelled it. Remember Bob Baer is CIA, part of his training is to mislead to misinform to spread whatever propaganda it is they want to spread.

    Hopefully the CIA files come this year and are not held back by President Trump. Then maybe we can finally have more evidence to the case.

    If anyone thinks that a TV show is going to give us answers to the biggest murder and cover-up in American history then this is why it will never be solved.

    Please if you are interested in the case read the true facts about the case and eye witness testimony. Please do not rely on tv programs to inform you what really happened. This is part of the reason their have been so many theories to this case. Just like a murder case that happens in this day and age, stick to the facts and evidence.

  29. Yes, the series impies that first Russia may have been involved, then not. And then Cuba may have been involved, but then the series stopped. So, we don’t know who was next up that may have been involved in the assisnation of JFK after Cuba in this investigator’s opinion. Does anyone have inside knowledge of what the remaining 4 episodes included? Is there a book written yet about his theories? I can’t say I agree or disagree with this investigator’s opinion until I know the results. We can assume whether he is right or wrong, but I prefer to hear what he has to say first.

  30. Mernie have you watched Hunting Hitler? Bob Baer wanted to lead us to believe that Hitler escaped. They ended the series with a place where Hitler might have gone and that was it. Bob Baer went on a radio show and said to the host that he thinks Hitler died in the bunker. So he lead everyone to believe during the series that he thought Hitler could have made it. Tv shows are one thing and one thing only,entertainment.

  31. So what in the hell happened to the series? They broadcast only 2 out of the 6 episodes, and that was 3 weeks ago!

  32. Oswald didn’t murder anyone. FBI found no fingerprints or palm prints on the rifle until the FBI delivered back to the Dallas police department. Then and only then a palm print appeared out of nowhere. Not to mention that oswald tested negative on the nitrates examination proving that oswald never fired a rifle that day, or for that reason any other day. Oswald had no nitrates on his face and cheek. This makes it impossible for a sniper to accurately fire a rifle. The murder of tippet is even more improbable. 4 shells were found at the murder scene. 2 were winchester, and 2 were Remington. But the bullets pulled from tippets body 3 were winchester while only one was Remington! The bullets did not add up! And the FBI could not determine the it came from oswald revolver. Which was not an automatic. Yet the Warren still concluded that it was oswald. And why didn’t this program bring up Sylvia odio? That same week oswald was suppose to be in Mexico city. He was in Dallas with 2 Cubans at odios apartment. The hsca conclusion in this field was that oswald was being impersonated in Mexico city. So why wouldn’t the history channel bring this up????

    • Maybe rather than making up your own conspiracy evidence, Fernando Benavides, you need to wake up to the fact that gun shot residue wasn’t even available until the mid 70’s having been first looked at as a possibility in 1971.

  33. Strange case of many, many coincidences. So all you coincidence theorists, go read Flip De May’s books then go read Douglas Horne’s Assassination Records Review Board five part detailed books about the strange coincidental medical evidence. Strange that trained law enforcement personnel, The Secret Service no less, found it necessary to start washing down the interior of the Presidential limo, obviously known to them as a critical piece of forensic evidence and an actual crime scene, while parked at Parkland Memorial Hospital. Strange coincidence that. Just one of many. Review CIA Level 5 event if you can find it.
    1) perpetrate the crime
    2) plant and control the public narrative
    3) control the evidence
    4) control the official inquiry
    5) classify all related documents and ahem …tie up any loose ends.

  34. The most likely reason behind closing files for a hundred years, was to protect intelligence sources at work in 1963. Johnson was no doubt protecting a network of spies behind the iron curtain. It’s quite possible the CIA had operatives working within the Kremlin. It probably took years to place such people, and revealing them would have set back US intelligence agencies years of work. Work they may have never been able to recover from, if their sources were revealed. Because these files were sealed at the time of the assassination, it left the impression something sinister was being surpressed. The problem now, is that even if this turns out to be the case, and the files when finally opened show this to be true, conspiracy theorists still won’t believe it. The idea of a conspiracy is so embedded in the public’s mind, no amount of evidence will ever clear up the matter.

Your Comment

Email (will not be published)