Problems Emerge Measuring Web Video Ads

Aug 31, 2008  •  Post A Comment

Web video advertising may be plagued by some of the same squishy metrics that have bedeviled traditional television ratings for years. New problems in estimating the size of the market suggest that the supposedly quantifiable Web is in fact sometimes too difficult to quantify.
Some market research firms forecasting the size of the online video ad economy aren’t counting money spent on brand integration and product placements.
Influential media research firm eMarketer recently revised its annual online video ad-spending numbers downwards by two-thirds to $505 million, citing a change in methodology. But neither its initial nor its revised projection accounts for money flowing into brand integration, product placement and host mentions in Web video.
“The share of the money going to product placement is a bit harder to gauge,” said David Hallerman, senior analyst with eMarketer.
Mr. Hallerman pointed out that most TV ad spending numbers do not take product placement into account either. eMarketer measures pre-rolls and other ads that look like TV ads online.
Mr. Hallerman said product placement should be counted, perhaps as a separate category.
“The medium may be more measurable, but ad spending isn’t necessarily,” he said.
That suggests the size of the Web video economy is being underestimated by the amount of ad dollars flowing into high-profile Web shows such as NBC-backed “Gemini Division,” EQAL-owned “LG15: The Resistance” and Revision3’s “Diggnation.”
That’s a problem because they generate most of their ad revenue from brand integration and host shoutouts, as do many Web studios including Next New Networks, Revision3, ManiaTV and For Your Imagination.
“The vast majority of revenue we derive for our shows are from brand integration,” said Greg Goodfried, one of the executive producers of “LonelyGirl15” and its spinoffs, which have inked deals with MSN, Disney, Paramount and Procter & Gamble.
The uncertainty surrounding market estimates touches nearly all parties with a stake in the Web video business, including media agencies that use macroeconomic figures when evangelizing the medium and venture capitalists who search out growing markets.
Research by its very nature is imprecise. Bill Tancer, the global head of research for online audience-measurement firm Hitwise, urges everyone to be skeptical when evaluating studies.
Mr. Hallerman explained that eMarketer sliced its previous $1.4 billion online video ad projection by two-thirds after the Internet Advertising Bureau said earlier this summer that online video ads had pulled in only $324 million in 2007. The IAB measures “digital video commercials” or “TV-like advertisements” that appear before, during or after a variety of content, but not brand integration.
“We believe we are capturing the biggest part of a growing market,” said David Doty, senior VP, thought leadership and marketing, at IAB.
People creating Web shows disagree.
“Brand integration is one of the biggest segments of the online video ad market, maybe bigger than pre-rolls,” said Raj Amin, CEO of HealthiNation, the online video health information network.
Lehman Brothers and Forrester Research also forecast the overall online video ad economy. Lehman has said advertisers will spend $1.1 billion on online video ads this year, but did not respond to requests for comment on its methodology. Forrester Research expects online video ad spending to hit $989 million this year, up from $471 million last year.
Forrester Research analyst James McQuivey said his company’s survey methods leave room for interpretation by agency respondents. To estimate the online video ad economy, Forrester asks advertisers if online video ad spending is trending up or down. That can be a complicated question to answer because a large chunk of online video ad spending comes from multiplatform buys in the broadcast upfront.
“We have found it to be difficult to disentangle what should be the online video ad spend when a Nissan sponsors ‘Heroes,’ for instance,” he said. “There is a lot of room for error.”
Still, Mr. McQuivey expects his original $989 million estimate to be close to the final tally at year’s end. While YouTube has faced difficulties in monetizing its ads, a site like Hulu has grown faster than expected, balancing things out, he said.
There are no current estimates on the size of product placement deals in Web video. But Web TV networks such as Revision3 and For Your Imagination said they charge $60 to $80 on a cost-per-thousand basis for such buys.
The silver lining in the prickly numbers debate is that most Web-content creators and distributors don’t rely on market estimates to sell their inventory to marketers. Instead, Revision3 touts that 100% of its viewers can recall at least one advertiser, Next New Networks talks up its 20 million monthly views and HealthiNation sells ads based on engagement with its content.
Mr. Amin relies on internal figures from online TV technology provider Brightcove indicating that HealthiNation viewers watch 2 million total minutes of its programming per month, with the average session lasting three minutes. “We run persistent banners during the videos and our deal sizes are three times what they were a year ago,” he said.
Still, advertisers want market estimates to include all formats, including brand integration.
“We would love for it to be broken out by category,” said Michael Hayes, senior VP of interactive at Initiative North America.
Forrester’s Mr. McQuivey said he’s likely to break out spending by format next year. eMarketer’s Mr. Hallerman said he does not have plans to do so at the moment.
Mr. Hayes said he’s not troubled by the fluctuating estimates. What’s important is the big picture: Online video ad spending is increasing this year, whether it’s by 56%, according to eMarketer, or by more than 100%, according to Forrester.


  1. Online video is still suffering from a standards problem.
    Every day millions of video views on Quicktime videos go unsold because video advertising networks are using Flash to deliver ads instead.
    Even thought the technology to deliver ads on Quicktime videos is there advertising networks are only using Flash.
    Flash has won this round for now but I would think that brand managers would want to reach Quicktime viewers on the iPod and the iPhone because of the intimacy of those devices.
    I wish someone would find a way to get Quicktime in the advertising game and get the word out to all of us Independent video producers who have millions of video views in video advertising inventory going unsold on iTunes.

  2. Good article. Yes, things are still squishy…but like tv did, eventually it will all come around.

  3. Great article which highlights the importance of integration to new media models. I think that there are three key drivers of this trend at the moment:
    (1) Content producers can control the economics of integration whereas display advertising is cut up into many pieces as content is passed down the value chain,
    (2) Integration deals negotiated at the development stage of a project make it more attractive to distributors, and
    (3) As you clearly call out, advertisers are paying a premium for high quality integrations.
    I’ve tried to flush out these drivers a bit more in a more formal post here.
    Great stuff.

  4. Nice article, it will be nice if Forrester does set the tone with category break downs. Would the 3 main categories be: 1. pre-roll,mid-roll,post-roll 2. brand and product integration 3. overlays?
    I hope 2009 is the year of standards for online video advertising.

  5. Great piece, Daisy. Referencing it on a post. Two points- I disagree with IAB that they’re capturing most of it. The low cpm on video ads means that’s a smaller portion of the spend. The product integration/sponsorship is worth a lot more to advertisers and creators. I make far more (as a creator) on custom videos than ad revenue, and that’s not just because I don’t have to share that income with YouTube. Second, I don’t like the FYI $80 CPM model… as an advertiser and creator, I prefer a fixed price per video with a capped (and modest) upside to incent the creator to seed it.

  6. Thank you for a great post

  7. Excellent job.

  8. Good post, thanks

  9. Why would it be that CNN let go Rick Sanchez, yet Laura Schlessinger’s unbelievably improper remarks are permitted.

  10. Sharron Angle says Muslim Law Taking Hold In Parts Of The us . , In my opinion , this woman implies the Whitehouse!!!!.

  11. Nice blog here! Also your website loads up fast! What host are you using? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

  12. Kudos to you! This is a really good blog here and I love your style of writing. How did you get so good at blogging?

  13. Amazing freakin blog here. I almost cried while reading it!

  14. Love the blog here. Nice colors. I am definitely staying tuned to this one. Hope to see more.

  15. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

  16. Amazing freakin blog here. I almost cried while reading it!

  17. cool.

  18. thanks.

  19. cool.

  20. Way to focus and straight to your point, i love it. Keep up the work people. Dont let anyone stop us bloggers.

  21. I like your blog.

  22. Awesome blog, nice writing 🙂

  23. Thanks for the update, it has been a while since I’m posting comments to blogs, this one is an exception. Keep up the great work buddy. I hope to see extra of them in the running a blog community.

  24. Really nice design and great content , practically nothing else we want : D.

Your Comment

Email (will not be published)