Adalian Column: ‘Black Thursday’ Hits ABC Dramas Hard

Nov 28, 2008  •  Post A Comment

For anyone who loves television, Nov. 20 may go down in the industry history books as Black Thursday.
On that date, ABC Entertainment President Steve McPherson was forced to call the producers of three outstanding young drama series and tell them that the network was giving up. He may have never said the words “You’re canceled,” but all parties involved knew what was happening: “Pushing Daisies,” “Dirty Sexy Money” and “Eli Stone” were dead.
It was a stunning single-day slaughter, a mass murder of some of the medium’s most promising newcomers. Good shows die prematurely on an alarmingly regular basis in TV, but somehow this felt different.
Perhaps it was because all the shows were on ABC.
After all, viewers have grown used to Fox and CBS short-circuiting series with passionate core audiences (R.I.P., “Swingtown” and “Arrested Development”). And while NBC sometimes shows the love to quality fare, there’s so much talk from its executives about product integration and managing for margins that it’s impossible to get all warm and fuzzy about anything the network does.
But under Mr. McPherson, ABC has seemed to operate under a set of governing principles different from those that exist elsewhere in the business. The long list of successful shows launched on his watch—from “Desperate Housewives” and “Grey’s Anatomy” to “Brothers & Sisters” and “Lost”—stood as evidence that broadcast networks could still soar with ambition, rather than simply survive with well-executed comfort food. Critical raves and popular acceptance weren’t mutually exclusive propositions in Mr. McPherson’s kingdom.
Black Thursday seemed to change all that. Suddenly, ABC was like every other network, breaking the hearts of passionate fans all over America. I don’t think Mr. McPherson delivered the ax lightly; just the opposite, in fact. Based on how long it took for the network to confirm decisions that had seemed unavoidable for weeks, ABC’s chief programmer seemed to be grasping for any excuse not to pull the plug.
What caused Mr. McPherson’s winning streak to come screeching to a halt? For one thing, bad timing. Really bad timing.
Hard to believe now, but just a year ago, Mr. McPherson’s quality-first formula was paying off, at least for “Daisies” and “Dirty.” Both got off to fast starts when they premiered on ABC’s completely revamped Wednesday lineup. Both seemed headed toward long lives.
Then came the writers strike.
There’s no way of knowing if “Daisies” and “Dirty” would have lasted had the Writers Guild of America not walked off the job last year. But there can be little doubt that the strike made their untimely passings inevitable. The momentum both shows demonstrated early on during the fall of 2007 melted away as viewers were forced to wait nearly a year for another batch of fresh episodes. Instead of spending last winter falling more deeply in love with “Daisies” and “Dirty,” viewers moved on.
Events conspired against ABC again this fall. Despite doing its usual bang-up job promoting the return of “Daisies” and “Dirty,” the network’s relaunch came at the height of a hugely compelling presidential campaign, and just as the economy was imploding.
ABC often makes a big deal out of how upscale and urban its audience is. It’s a great asset when trying to set advertising prices, but not when your viewers are more interested in watching their portfolios wither away on CNBC than in checking out escapist dramas.
I’d feel a lot less gloomy about the events of Nov. 20 if unfortunate timing were the only factor behind ABC’s awful autumn. Unfortunately, there’s evidence to suggest something else might be at play.
Call it the Tim Kring theory.
Mr. Kring, creator of NBC’s “Heroes,” recently told a writers expo that serialized dramas such as his are “a very flawed way of telling stories on network television right now, because of the advent of the DVR and online streaming.”
“The engine that drove [serialized TV] was you had to be in front of the TV [when it aired],” he said. “Now you can watch it when you want, where you want, how you want to watch it, and almost all of those ways are superior to watching it on-air. So [watching it] on-air is related to the saps and the dipshits who can’t figure out how to watch it in a superior way.”
Mr. Kring has been taking a lot of flack on the Web for his comments, since they come off as both an insult to viewers and as the delusional ramblings of a producer who can’t admit his show has fallen off a creative cliff.
He may be guilty on both counts, but Mr. Kring hit upon a larger problem facing networks that aspire to airing complicated series. These days it seems the cooler, more intricate the show, the less likely it is that Nielsen will be able to accurately—and quickly—measure its audience.
Sure, Nielsen generates numbers showing how many viewers watch a show via DVR—as long as they watch within seven days. But those of us who decide to watch a dozen episodes of “Chuck” in a Hanukkah-week Hulu marathon? Or who figure “Dirty Sexy Money” is a dish best enjoyed via a summertime DVD box-set splurge? We don’t count.
Indeed, since advertisers really only care about those folks who watch commercials within three days of a show’s airing, anyone smart or busy or young enough to figure out how to avoid watching a series in real time doesn’t really count, either. Touting a 79% increase in a show’s viewership after DVR data is factored in makes for a nice press release, but it doesn’t pay the bills.
It’s not hard to see where this is all going. Until Nielsen or the networks figure out how to more accurately measure viewing across multiple platforms—and how to monetize it—network suits like Mr. McPherson are going to be under increasing pressure to develop shows geared toward the saps and dipshits who still watch TV the old-fashioned way.
Don’t think that’s such a bad thing? Consider this: One of the least DVR’d shows on television is “Deal or No Deal.”
Case closed.


  1. Your priorities and analysis of your viewers and age demograhics are WAY off!There are many other solutions to marketing than what you are availing yourselves of!(See something REALLY unique in promotions for EUREKA,folks!)
    You really need to **SAVE PUSHING DAISIES**!!! It won’t be all that hard to do. Expand your thinking as the show actually promotes that!WAKE UP!!-Or put us to sleep with more of the same GARBAGE broadcasting that we can find on every OTHER station!…There go your viewers & their loyalties!
    UNBELIEVABLE!! You finally get a WINNING show, with FANTASTIC characters, FABULOUS CAST!,ORIGINAL and different storyline with fast moving EXTREMELY WITTY dialogue for those of us who aren’t brain dead with your stupid ‘reality’ garbage, and you decide to CANCEL IT?????!!!! -BAD MOVE! PUSHING DAISIES is the best show you’ve come up with yet! There are still plenty of us out here that need a little humor and mental stimulation. And what a fantastic combination of cast! It’s my FAVORITE SHOW! I really don’t need more remakes, copycat or generally large breasted based interest shows with NO SUBSTANCE! These are just the ABSOLUTELY **BEST ACTORS** who work so well together! This is REAL ENTERTAINMENT! (And trying to shove us over to ‘Chuck’ by making ‘duplicate image’ characters won’t work for me-Think We didn’t notice??)
    **And By The Way…these are **EXCELLENT WRITERS**- worth their WEIGHT in GOLD! Keep them on this…WE WANT MORE!!!!
    If ratings seemed lower after the writers strike- think of THIS… You made us wait forever and **NEVER PROMOTED** the RETURN of Pushing Daisies as you did other shows. Your viewers became confused & LOST trying to find out WHEN or IF* you would ever bring it back! I get enough internet, and have no desire to have to go look it up on a website! (*Just for the record…by reading an old article, is the FIRST I’ve heard of your Pie Hole trailer! It should’ve been added to the end or as a commercial attachment during the show*. I would’ve loved to see that!)
    DUHHH! *THIS ONE HAS SUSTANCE! What a wonderful escape FROM the true reality!
    *And you would DENY US a real conclusion by continuing the saga in a COMIC BOOK???!!! Thanks for NOTHING, ABC! What’s wrong with you?
    **CONTINUE THIS SHOW!! Dump some of the other really JUNK shows for the mindless kiddies instead!

  2. very informative post, I will be coming back to this website now and again to see more material of this quality!! btw does anybody know if this site that says i can

  3. Thanks for your visiting this http://www.hello-free.com/freebies online Free WebSite.

  4. The significantly anticipated Glee Britney Spears event broadcast yesterday, the time and again bothered but yet it seems like recuperating performer coming up with a terrific look and feel, must adore her for this, moreso than that Lohan young lady.

  5. Stupid is just as stupid does…this whole thing is mostly a joke. Lindsay Lohan will go onto do harmful drugs since the woman does not “get it”…The entire legal system is a faiytale. You need to put the girl in some gaol in Cincinnati or some other place in Ohio where there is no overcrowding and there’s no mindless system that usually lets these people get away with ****. At a minimum if the woman is going to carry on to do substances she really should be “savvy” about it and don’t get caught…or else, continue with what you’re doing Lindsay and we should drop you inside of Afghanistan with the unbelievably daring troops which are losing their lives everyday to provide you with your silly so-called “freedom”.

  6. The somewhat hoped for Glee Britney Spears episode was shown yesterday evening, over the generally plagued having said that evidently recouping singer making a memorable overall look, must absolutely adore her for this, greater than that Lohan gal.

  7. This is the best blog I’ve ever seen in my life! I really appreciate you taking the time out of your busy day to share your this with everyone.

  8. I really like the colors here on your blog. did you design this yourself or did you outsource it to a professional?

  9. Nice!! Great Ifo. Great People. Great Blog. Thank you for all the great sharing that is being done here.

  10. Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy.

  11. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  12. What a comfort to learn a page that might be ultimately in actuality value reading! I’ve been seeking all-around regarding this focus but men and women now put rubbish posts, or brief meaningless posts. I contain noticed a couple vids on youtube but it’s now the identical as reading a good post.

  13. Me also, tyvm for posting th is..

  14. Unquestionably good examine of brand and logos, thanks.

  15. I’ve a brand new one for the worst:

  16. I really like the colors here on your blog. did you design this yourself or did you outsource it to a professional?

Leave a Reply to Collection Agencies Cancel Reply

Email (will not be published)