Logo

THR, IMDb, TVWeek

California’s New IMDb Law Is Probably Unconstitutional, According to Experts

Sep 27, 2016  •  Post A Comment

A new law in California is coming under scrutiny, with a number of experts saying it would be unlikely to survive a constitutional challenge, according to The Hollywood Reporter. The law is aimed at the movie site IMDb and would require the site to remove information about an actor’s age or date of birth upon request.

The publication reports that six lawyers and law professors cited First Amendment concerns about the law.

“A seventh lawyer and former law professor, an expert in discrimination law, was equivocal but thought on balance that the law, known as AB 1687, would survive a constitutional challenge, while SAG-AFTRA’s general counsel and the bill’s sponsor were confident that the statute could withstand litigation,” THR reports.

But the report adds that the opinion of Floyd Abrams, a prominent First Amendment lawyer, was more typical of those surveyed. In an exclusive interview with THR, Abrams is quoted saying: “The statute seems to me of the most dubious constitutionality. Birth dates are facts. It’s hard to see how the government, consistently with the First Amendment‎, can bar or punish their disclosure.”

SAG-AFTRA helped push through the law, citing age discrimination concerns. The measure sailed through both houses of the state Legislature and was signed into law Saturday by California Gov. Jerry Brown.

A quick check of IMDb this morning showed the birth dates of actors and actresses still prominently featured on the site, as in the example below.

betty-white-imdb-profile

3 Comments

  1. Are they also going to demand their age not be on their driver’s license and passport?

  2. there needs to be a law against new laws …

    • It’s called the Constitution.

      Btw, this legislation is as absurd as can be and just validates the widely-held reputation of California as a laughing stock. The information that the vain of entertainment industry are trying to censor is, by law, a matter of public record and therefore freely accessible to anyone.

      If nothing else this all just goes to show you how entrenched the entertainment industry is in the California political system.

      Talk about your special interests.

Leave a Reply to Guilty Cleric Cancel Reply

Email (will not be published)